[Calclg-l] Fiscal Impacts of mills Act
Bill Tuikka
btuikka at ci.vallejo.ca.us
Mon Jan 7 09:14:16 PST 2008
The only incentive here in Vallejo is the tax reduction from the Mills Act contract. We processed 5 residential Mills Act applications in 2007, and just took in the first for 2007 on Jan. 3rd.
Bill Tuikka, AICP
Planning Division
Development Services Department
City of Vallejo
707.648.5391
>>> Wendy Ward <wwbike at pacbell.net> 1/4/2008 2:54 PM >>>
Jim and all list members
As a Cultural Heritage Commissioner for City of Napa, I am curious to
the many historic preservation incentives you have..we're lacking in
that area so I'd greatly like to hear from you. We have utilized the
Mills Act on a commercial basis but there seems to be little for
historic homeowners to turn to. I am interested in both commercial and
residential incentives.
Thank you and Happy New Year
Wendy Ward
City of Napa, Cultural Heritage Commission
On Dec 19, 2007, at 3:03 PM, Pechous, Jim wrote:
> Meg,
>
> If you do the math the actual loss in City tax dollars is very low
> especially if you factor in the return which is the projection of City
> historic resources. Prior to the Mills Act we had a much higher
> percentage of people attempting to delist their property or to
> demolition their historic structure. This is by far our best historic
> preservation incentive our City has, and we have many. The only
> pitfall I can think of is that it will take staff time to process and
> manage your mills act contracts. One way to reduce tax burden, if
> that is a concern, and to reduce a sudden impact to your staff work
> load is to limit the number of contracts allowed per year. We limit
> our contract to five the first three quarters of the year. Our
> program has been in existence for over 10 years and we have a little
> over 50 active contracts.
>
> Good luck!
> Jim
>
> Jim Pechous
> Principal Planner, Planning Division
> City of San Clemente
>
> 910 Calle Negocio Suite 100
> San Clemente, CA 92673
> Phone: (949)361-6195
> Fax: (949)366-4750
> Email: pechousj at san-clemente.org
> Website: http://www.san ( http://www.san/ )-clemente.org/sc/Standard.aspx?PageID=255
>
> From: calclg-l-bounces at ohp.parks.ca.gov
> [mailto:calclg-l-bounces at ohp.parks.ca.gov] On Behalf Of Clovis, Meg
> x4913
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 2:42 PM
> To: calclg-l at ohp.parks.ca.gov
> Subject: [Calclg-l] Fiscal Impacts of mills Act
>
>
> The County of Monterey is considering implementing the Mills Act but
> would like input from other jurisdictions re: adverse affects due to
> reduced property tax revenues. In addition, any advice about pitfalls
> to avoid would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks for your assistance -
>
> Meg Clovis
> Cultural Affairs Manager
> Monterey County Parks
> _______________________________________________
> Calclg-l mailing list
> Calclg-l at ohp.parks.ca.gov
> http://lists.cwo.com/mailman/listinfo/calclg-l
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.cwo.com/pipermail/calclg-l/attachments/20080107/3b9add2d/attachment-0001.html
More information about the Calclg-l
mailing list